![]() ![]() Finally, it's supported by nature, underpins all ethics, and is easy to justify, but more about these in a moment. There's nothing wrong with reckless carbon consumption unless we consider the effects it will have on whoever's alive to reap the consequences of such activity in the next century. duty-based) normative ethical theories do not require adherents to systematically consider the consequences of their actions this renders these theories unable to adequately deal with several profound ethical problems, like why we should stop pumping carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Although this facet of the theory isn't problem-free, one major advantage is that its focus on consequences instead of actions makes it helpful for addressing environmental issues (and others that involve more distant effects). Second, it's commonsensical, which means it appears concerned with the kinds of things that we intuitively believe ethics should focus on: promoting pleasure (which utilitarians equate with good) and preventing pain (which they equate with evil). the principle of utility), making it easy to apply in the absence of competing or conflicting principles. First, utilitarianism is relatively simple: it rests on a single principle (i.e. The evaluation of any normative ethical theory rests on an analysis of its supposed strengths and weaknesses, which is why the various points presented for and against utilitarianism provide the content for our discussion. What are the strengths and weaknesses of utilitarianism? ![]() This doesn't mean we shouldn't take them seriously (Peter Singer, one of preference utilitarianism's most famous proponents, took some of them seriously enough to significantly modify his position) even if we may be unlikely to find them persuasive.ฤก. ![]() Of course, critics of the theory range several robust objections against it, but none have proved fatal to its popularity in the twenty-first century. In my opinion, it's one of the strongest arguments in support of utilitarianism, although there are a host of other reasons for subscribing to it that others find more convincing. Just as we can't escape our human nature, we can't escape our utilitarian tendencies or so we're told. There's something arresting and highly attractive about this idea, at least to my mind. One of John Stuart Mill's most gripping claims is that everyone's really a utilitarian, or, formulated in a less inflammatory fashion, that every ethic anyone can follow was originally founded on the principle of utility. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |